The Islamic Republic's survival following U.S.-Israeli military actions and a subsequent ceasefire agreement earlier in 2026 has anchored trader consensus against Reza Pahlavi assuming leadership by year's end. Despite protests, diaspora mobilization, and Pahlavi's positioning as a potential transitional figure for a secular democratic process, the regime retained power without external endorsement of regime change or his installation. U.S. officials explicitly distanced themselves from supporting his candidacy, while opposition divisions and questions over his domestic networks persisted. This trajectory aligns with the high implied probability of "No," though unexpected internal upheaval or a sudden power vacuum could still elevate his transitional role before the market resolves.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedWill Reza Pahlavi lead Iran in 2026?
$11,733,231 Vol.
$11,733,231 Vol.
$11,733,231 Vol.
$11,733,231 Vol.
Reza Pahlavi will be considered to hold power if he exercises primary governing authority over the Iranian state during the specified timeframe, including effective control over the armed forces, national institutions, and core executive decision-making, regardless of formal title, constitutional designation, or international recognition.
Formal appointment, recognition by the United Nations, or recognition by foreign governments is not required.
Indicators of de facto authority may include control over the armed forces and security services; control over executive ministries and state administrative institutions; enforcement of national laws; issuance of binding national directives; and effective control over the capital and core state infrastructure.
Symbolic status, foreign recognition without domestic control, exile leadership without effective authority inside Iran, nomination without effective authority, or ceremonial or transitional status without governing control will not qualify.
If Iran experiences a period in which no individual exercises effective governing control, this will not alone qualify for a “Yes” resolution unless Reza Pahlavi subsequently meets the criteria above within the specified timeframe.
The primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: Feb 28, 2026, 10:36 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Reza Pahlavi will be considered to hold power if he exercises primary governing authority over the Iranian state during the specified timeframe, including effective control over the armed forces, national institutions, and core executive decision-making, regardless of formal title, constitutional designation, or international recognition.
Formal appointment, recognition by the United Nations, or recognition by foreign governments is not required.
Indicators of de facto authority may include control over the armed forces and security services; control over executive ministries and state administrative institutions; enforcement of national laws; issuance of binding national directives; and effective control over the capital and core state infrastructure.
Symbolic status, foreign recognition without domestic control, exile leadership without effective authority inside Iran, nomination without effective authority, or ceremonial or transitional status without governing control will not qualify.
If Iran experiences a period in which no individual exercises effective governing control, this will not alone qualify for a “Yes” resolution unless Reza Pahlavi subsequently meets the criteria above within the specified timeframe.
The primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Islamic Republic's survival following U.S.-Israeli military actions and a subsequent ceasefire agreement earlier in 2026 has anchored trader consensus against Reza Pahlavi assuming leadership by year's end. Despite protests, diaspora mobilization, and Pahlavi's positioning as a potential transitional figure for a secular democratic process, the regime retained power without external endorsement of regime change or his installation. U.S. officials explicitly distanced themselves from supporting his candidacy, while opposition divisions and questions over his domestic networks persisted. This trajectory aligns with the high implied probability of "No," though unexpected internal upheaval or a sudden power vacuum could still elevate his transitional role before the market resolves.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions