Trump maintains an active public profile as president, frequently criticizing individuals through social media posts, press interactions, and speeches. Recent months have featured repeated exchanges with journalists, including pointed remarks toward female reporters during Oval Office sessions and events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner redo. Geopolitical developments around Iran, including military actions near the Strait of Hormuz, have prompted official statements that reference adversaries and domestic critics. Scheduled September activities, such as appearances at the Republican National Convention and the UN General Assembly, provide additional platforms for unscripted comments. Market participants weigh these patterns against the short resolution window ending September 30, noting that personal or professional attacks on listed figures would trigger resolution based on verifiable public statements.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated$42,976 Vol.
Sep 30, 2026
Barack Obama
91%
Letitia James
87%
Hillary Clinton
65%
Kaitlan Collins
59%
Mark Carney
56%
Tucker Carlson
65%
Elizabeth Warren
52%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
50%
Adam Schiff
30%
Kathy Hochul
48%
Norah O'Donnell
39%
Jon Ossoff
30%
Stephen Colbert
29%
Elon Musk
26%
Jimmy Kimmel
25%
Emmanuel Macron
21%
Friedrich Merz
21%
Andy Burnham
20%
Candace Owens
19%
Jerome Powell
17%
Alex Jones
13%
Benjamin Netanyahu
13%
Pam Bondi
12%
Vladimir Putin
10%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Melania Trump
11%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
36%
J.B. Pritzker
47%
Abdul El-Sayed
52%
Ilhan Omar
61%
Zohran Mamdani
48%
$42,976 Vol.
Barack Obama
$2,220 Vol.
91%
Letitia James
$368 Vol.
87%
Hillary Clinton
$1,440 Vol.
65%
Kaitlan Collins
$624 Vol.
59%
Mark Carney
$2,596 Vol.
56%
Tucker Carlson
$2,163 Vol.
65%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
52%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,414 Vol.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$140 Vol.
50%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
30%
Kathy Hochul
$1,760 Vol.
48%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
39%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
30%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
29%
Elon Musk
$62 Vol.
26%
Jimmy Kimmel
$823 Vol.
25%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,001 Vol.
21%
Friedrich Merz
$1,106 Vol.
21%
Andy Burnham
$1,796 Vol.
20%
Candace Owens
$1,644 Vol.
19%
Jerome Powell
$1,309 Vol.
17%
Alex Jones
$60 Vol.
13%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,189 Vol.
13%
Pam Bondi
$76 Vol.
12%
Vladimir Putin
$1,824 Vol.
10%
Kevin Warsh
$3,646 Vol.
8%
Mohammed bin Salman
$380 Vol.
7%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
11%
Pope Leo XIV
$959 Vol.
5%
J.D. Vance
$1,273 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$384 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$272 Vol.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Vol.
36%
J.B. Pritzker
$264 Vol.
47%
Abdul El-Sayed
$1,016 Vol.
52%
Ilhan Omar
$163 Vol.
61%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,229 Vol.
48%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump maintains an active public profile as president, frequently criticizing individuals through social media posts, press interactions, and speeches. Recent months have featured repeated exchanges with journalists, including pointed remarks toward female reporters during Oval Office sessions and events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner redo. Geopolitical developments around Iran, including military actions near the Strait of Hormuz, have prompted official statements that reference adversaries and domestic critics. Scheduled September activities, such as appearances at the Republican National Convention and the UN General Assembly, provide additional platforms for unscripted comments. Market participants weigh these patterns against the short resolution window ending September 30, noting that personal or professional attacks on listed figures would trigger resolution based on verifiable public statements.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$42,976End Date
Sep 30, 2026Market Opened
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump maintains an active public profile as president, frequently criticizing individuals through social media posts, press interactions, and speeches. Recent months have featured repeated exchanges with journalists, including pointed remarks toward female reporters during Oval Office sessions and events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner redo. Geopolitical developments around Iran, including military actions near the Strait of Hormuz, have prompted official statements that reference adversaries and domestic critics. Scheduled September activities, such as appearances at the Republican National Convention and the UN General Assembly, provide additional platforms for unscripted comments. Market participants weigh these patterns against the short resolution window ending September 30, noting that personal or professional attacks on listed figures would trigger resolution based on verifiable public statements.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$42,976End Date
Sep 30, 2026Market Opened
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump maintains an active public profile as president, frequently criticizing individuals through social media posts, press interactions, and speeches. Recent months have featured repeated exchanges with journalists, including pointed remarks toward female reporters during Oval Office sessions and events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner redo. Geopolitical developments around Iran, including military actions near the Strait of Hormuz, have prompted official statements that reference adversaries and domestic critics. Scheduled September activities, such as appearances at the Republican National Convention and the UN General Assembly, provide additional platforms for unscripted comments. Market participants weigh these patterns against the short resolution window ending September 30, noting that personal or professional attacks on listed figures would trigger resolution based on verifiable public statements.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions