**The Virslīga 2026 clean-sheet race remains tightly contested midway through the campaign, with roughly 27–29 matches played per side.** RFS leads with 14 clean sheets in 27 games (52% rate), ahead of Riga FC and Auda on 11 each, while most other clubs sit between 1 and 8. Strong defensive organization from the top three has kept them ahead so far, yet the large number of remaining fixtures, combined with recent results showing goals in several high-profile matches (including Liepāja’s 3-2 win over Riga), leaves room for shifts in form, squad rotation, or fixture difficulty. Traders price every listed side near 49–50%, reflecting broad uncertainty over who will finish with the outright most clean sheets.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedFK Liepāja 100%
Ogre United 98%
Riga FC 98%
RFS 98%
FK Liepāja
100%
Ogre United
98%
Riga FC
98%
RFS
98%
FS Jelgava
98%
BFC Daugavpils
98%
FK Auda
98%
Grobiņas SC
98%
SK Super Nova
98%
Tukums 2000
98%
FK Liepāja 100%
Ogre United 98%
Riga FC 98%
RFS 98%
FK Liepāja
100%
Ogre United
98%
Riga FC
98%
RFS
98%
FS Jelgava
98%
BFC Daugavpils
98%
FK Auda
98%
Grobiņas SC
98%
SK Super Nova
98%
Tukums 2000
98%
In the event of a tie, this market will resolve in favor of the team with the fewest total goals conceded during the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season. If a tie still persists, this market will resolve in favor of the team with the higher final standing in the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia). If a tie still persists, this market will resolve to "Other".
Only regular season clean sheets will be considered for this market. Clean sheets recorded in playoff, relegation, postseason, preseason, or any other stage of competition will not be considered.
If the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season concludes early, is shortened, or is truncated for any reason, the outcome shall be determined using available Virslīga (Latvia) statistics for completed games.
If the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or it is unclear which team led Virslīga (Latvia) in clean sheets within that timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source for this market will be official information from Virslīga (Latvia); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 26, 2026, 5:46 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...In the event of a tie, this market will resolve in favor of the team with the fewest total goals conceded during the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season. If a tie still persists, this market will resolve in favor of the team with the higher final standing in the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia). If a tie still persists, this market will resolve to "Other".
Only regular season clean sheets will be considered for this market. Clean sheets recorded in playoff, relegation, postseason, preseason, or any other stage of competition will not be considered.
If the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season concludes early, is shortened, or is truncated for any reason, the outcome shall be determined using available Virslīga (Latvia) statistics for completed games.
If the 2026 Virslīga (Latvia) season is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or it is unclear which team led Virslīga (Latvia) in clean sheets within that timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source for this market will be official information from Virslīga (Latvia); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...**The Virslīga 2026 clean-sheet race remains tightly contested midway through the campaign, with roughly 27–29 matches played per side.** RFS leads with 14 clean sheets in 27 games (52% rate), ahead of Riga FC and Auda on 11 each, while most other clubs sit between 1 and 8. Strong defensive organization from the top three has kept them ahead so far, yet the large number of remaining fixtures, combined with recent results showing goals in several high-profile matches (including Liepāja’s 3-2 win over Riga), leaves room for shifts in form, squad rotation, or fixture difficulty. Traders price every listed side near 49–50%, reflecting broad uncertainty over who will finish with the outright most clean sheets.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions